Maxwell Render

Maxwell Render Information Repository
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 5:14 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: probable bug in SSSSS
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 93
hi,
i'm editing a leaf material in LW Maxwell shader, and i think there is a bug.
If i set attenuation distance in MM, it seems there's no way to get an attenuation effect in material, no matter how thick you set it in SS SSS settings.
I.e. i set att. dist. at 2 mm, and set thickness at 1.5 mm, and translucency is gray (it should be green).
If i set attenuation in UM, then i can get some color filtering setting very high thickness values (i.e. 10, which should correspond to 10m).
I think there's a measurement unit issue here. Can anyone confirm ?

Paolo

_________________
Paolo Zambrini
Engram Studio
www.engram.it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 93
ok, probably i discovered something; thickness value is always in mm, no matter if you type a unit. I.e, if i type 0.5m, Lightwave usually understrand it. in this case, if i type 0.001m, it will discard unit and consider that number as millimeters always.
Maybe it's enough to write "mm" near the numeric field.

Paolo

_________________
Paolo Zambrini
Engram Studio
www.engram.it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:03 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:20 am
Posts: 1825
Yes, the units are always in mm, the plug-in doesn't take into account the unit you type in the field.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:50 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 93
thanks.
As said, maybe it's nice to have it written aside the field to prevent other from same error ;)

bye
paolo

_________________
Paolo Zambrini
Engram Studio
www.engram.it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:55 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 14
If so, why don't you remove the Attenuation Unit setting ?

_________________
Eddy Marillat - PIXYM
Work Station: Dual Xeon 5650 (OC@4ghz 12 cores/24 threads)/24GB Ram/3x Nvidia gtx580 3GB/Win 7 64bits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:20 am
Posts: 1825
The attenuation unit setting affects the attenuation distance, which has a large range. If we always used mm for it (for example), you would have to input large values for some common materials. If we used a larger unit, you couldn't express very small attenuation distances, because the field is limited to 3 digits of precision (or something close to that).

This discussion was about the thickness value, which is different (smaller practical range) and doesn't use the attenuation unit setting. PaZ was saying that it doesn't respect the unit typed into the control (i.e. if you type 0.1 cm, instead of just 0.1), not that it doesn't respect the attenuation unit. Units typed into controls are not supported because the LW SDK doesn't expose them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:24 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 14
Okay, thanks a lot for the clarification.

_________________
Eddy Marillat - PIXYM
Work Station: Dual Xeon 5650 (OC@4ghz 12 cores/24 threads)/24GB Ram/3x Nvidia gtx580 3GB/Win 7 64bits


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group