Maxwell Render

Maxwell Render Information Repository
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:20 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:11 pm
Posts: 2426
Location: Renaissance Vector
I'm getting some kind of pattern on a plain box of glass that shouldn't be there:
Image

I made sure the mesh doesn't intersect with others and switched between several different environment maps, no luck.

Any ideas welcome.

_________________
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe
-Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:18 am
Posts: 46
Location: New York
Newton's rings ?
maybe Maxwell is too physically accurate?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:11 pm
Posts: 2426
Location: Renaissance Vector
That could well be it, i haven't witnessed it ever before. The glass plate mesh is perfectly straight and doesn't even contain edges that would allow a bent shape (a necessity for the effect i read).

Using AGS solves it but looks really cheap.

Here a full render showing the effect nicely:
Image

Arrgh Maxwell, i don't know if i should be bothered or amazed :P

_________________
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe
-Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:10 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:18 am
Posts: 46
Location: New York
I've seen this effect in photography when two flat pieces of glass are touching, but as you said, there's nothing touching. How was your original glass material made - is there a coating?
Very nice object design and modeling btw.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:09 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:06 am
Posts: 1708
Location: Leeds, UK
Very strange. :shock:

Any chance you could post an mxs with just the glass section & lighting?

I'd be really interested to disect this.

The really strange thing for me, is the edge of the glass nearest the camera, halfway up it looks as though a normal is inverted, but it's one of the concentric rings that has been cut in two. :?

Cheers,

Tim.

_________________
http://emp3d.com
-------------------------------------
Next Limit Certified Training Centre for Maxwell Render.
Maxwell Render Training & consultancy. A-Team tester.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:32 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:58 pm
Posts: 3016
Location: Madrid
Does it show from any other angle?

_________________
http://www.ftella.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 7609
What's the Nd and what happens when you change it?

_________________
Next Limit Team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:11 pm
Posts: 2426
Location: Renaissance Vector
Quote:
Does it show from any other angle?

It seems to disappear when the angle gets less steep, but not right away, maybe at 30° less or so which changes the whole idea i had for this render.

When moving the glass out far enough (away from the rest), it's pretty much gone at steep angles at well, but still the glass doesn't look normal imho. Very strong ring reflections remain at the short side of the glass, that is closest to the camera.

The glass has a microbevel, i hope that isn't the cause.

Quote:
What's the Nd and what happens when you change it?

1.51 (Wizard default)

The phase of the pattern changes so to speak, but it doesn't vanish at all.



I'm gonna experiment a bit in Modo and see if there's some mesh error.

_________________
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe
-Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:57 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:50 pm
Posts: 1630
Location: vienna
cool!
if you want to get this you would never get it;-)
cheers
stefan

p.s. are you sure there is nothing doubled, faces or polygons?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 7384
Location: Uzbjeckiazutjenikitzistan
Very strange thing :shock: Could be a scientific discovery of light interaction :) It does look like an interference pattern, light trapped bouncing between the back of the glass and the support.....if you could post a closeup wireframe view...

_________________
Next Limit Team
Merchant of happiness


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 7609
I've seen something similar on the edge of a micro-beveled prism as well. But it was rather linear. I wonder if this is a bug due to possible rounding/clipping problems of values but it's very early to talk about it yet. Adrian, due to the originality of your object I would like to have this scene with a simple plane replacement (of course while keeping the same effect) instead of the original stand if you mind. Let's examine what's really going on here. Thank you.

_________________
Next Limit Team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:11 pm
Posts: 2426
Location: Renaissance Vector
Ok i got to run some more tests, and sadly the microbevel on the glass plate seems to be the sole cause.

Image
A quick viewport render with a non beveled block in place, no strange artifacts what so ever.
The beveled glass plate still shows heavy patterns under 100% equal circumstances.

_________________
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe
-Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 5682
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Hm, in your 3d program can you remove phongshading from the glass surfaces which are close together and try again to see if that makes a difference ? just speculating a little here..

/ Max

_________________
http://maximus3d.blogspot.com/
http://magnus3d.cgsociety.org/gallery/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/magnus3dphoto/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:44 pm
Posts: 5012
Location: Pole Position
...still pretty cool Adrian. ;)

_________________
Fall WinterSpringSummer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:40 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 7609
Adrian, I don't remember if you're working with 3dsmax but in my own
test I identified the problem clearly. It's due to high smoothing angle with
long triangles which could be a plugin problem. Typically 30 degrees
should be fine for smoothing surfaces properly. But when I make a similar
scene (with microbevels) in 3dsmax, the plugin exported the smoothed
microbevel glass with 60 degrees smoothing angle which could be also
due to 3dmax's internal default angle. So, I don't put the blame directly
on the plug-in here. We will investigate it. (see at the bottom of this post)

When I render directly from 3dsmax, the output comes like in your example.
Causes: Proportionally long triangles with a high smoothing angle (60).
Image

When I disable smoothing for the object in max (of course while keeping
the microbevels) it comes as expected. Another way is exporting the scene
as MXS and opening it in Studio and changing the smoothing angle from
60 to 30 and "Recalc" normals.
Image

Of course the user shouldn't worry about above issues and use these
workarounds to overcome this problem. I'm not sure if we can avoid
ringing in these specific geometric conditions with improper smoothing
angles in the core but there could be a solution with the plugins' handling
of smoothing angles when using host applications' primitives.

Thanks for catching this and I will let you know when it's solved. :arrow:

-edit: Yes, now I added a Smooth modifier at the top of the stack which is
even disabled and 3dsmax exported the object smoothing correctly now.
I'm sure our friends will fix it with the upcoming version of the plugin(s).
Since it's clear 3dsmax has this problem, I'm moving this thread under
3dsmax section. Once again, thank you.

_________________
Next Limit Team


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group